I’m seeing here only 3.3/3.3/2.3 variations but can someone explain to me how they are better then “all around” 3.2/3.2/3.2?
Often time it is traction to speed and speed to handling. People have found that cars perform better on certain tracks in different variations other than 3.2 across the board.
I’m seeing here only 3.3/3.3/2.3 variations but can someone explain to me how they are better then “all around” 3.2/3.2/3.2?
Often time it is traction to speed and speed to handling. People have found that cars perform better on certain tracks in different variations other than 3.2 across the board.
I see, thanks for the clarification Gsearch. I’ll stick to the working formula around here
Yes, I am looking for images, not the text. It is well done, to say the least. Great work. I think you have one of your EVO's mislabeled. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VIII MR FQ-360. i think those are the stat for the vo IX MR FQ-360. I don't see the VIII getting from 4.7 to 3.3 in 0-60.
Comments
I’ll stick to the working formula around here
Any body Max out these:
Escalade EXT
Honda Pilot 4WD (why?)
Suburban
Thanks!
173/3.7/85 (3/2/3)
1053/Low/No/No
RWD/Performance
Honda Civic Type R (2000/C)
158/5.3/86 (3/3/2)
1143/Medium/Yes/Yes
FWD/Performance
Nissan X-Trail (2001/C)
119/8.4/84 (3/2/3)
1319/High/No/Yes
4WD/All
102/10.4/84 (2/3/3)
796/Medium/Yes/Yes
FWD/Standard
Ford Granada 2.8i S (1977/E)
126/7.0/69 (3/3/2)
1275/Medium/No/No
RWD/Standard
Citroen SM 2.7 Injection (1970/E)
154/6.5/70 (3/3/2)
1350/Low/No/No
FWD/Performance
1321/Medium/Yes/Yes
Vauxhall VX220 Turbo
904/Low/No/Yes

2007/High/Yes/Yes
Ford Escort RS Cosworth
140/6.3/75 (3/2/3)
1747/High/Yes/Yes
4WD/All
Porsche 968 (1992/C)
170/4.9/85 (3/3/2)
1233/Low/No/Yes
RWD/Performance
Lotus Elan SE (1989/C)
148/5.2/87 (3/3/2)
918/Low/No/Yes
FWD/Performance
Honda Beat (1991/F)
90/10.0/85 (3/2/3)
708/Low/No/No
RWD/Performance
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VIII MR FQ-360. i think those are the stat for the vo IX MR FQ-360. I don't see the VIII getting from 4.7 to 3.3 in 0-60.