guys, now this data is available on the web-site - http://topdrives.club/upgraded-vehicles for this moment I'm upgrading the spreadsheet and the web-site, but I'm planning to close the first one soon
if you think that spreadsheet is more useful than web-site for some reasons - please tell me
Very nice job!! But I think this is added wrongly, it has both same upgrades
guys, now this data is available on the web-site - http://topdrives.club/upgraded-vehicles for this moment I'm upgrading the spreadsheet and the web-site, but I'm planning to close the first one soon
if you think that spreadsheet is more useful than web-site for some reasons - please tell me
Very nice job!! But I think this is added wrongly, it has both same upgrades
Yeah there's some wrong info in there @eSeal will be fixing them soon!
guys, now this data is available on the web-site - http://topdrives.club/upgraded-vehicles for this moment I'm upgrading the spreadsheet and the web-site, but I'm planning to close the first one soon
if you think that spreadsheet is more useful than web-site for some reasons - please tell me
Very nice job!! But I think this is added wrongly, it has both same upgrades
@Jaco fixed. second Ford GT should be S29 there was a lot of such mistakes - cars with the same names were added like one car with lowest RQ.. I have fixed it on Friday, but you find one more thanks
guys, now this data is available on the web-site - http://topdrives.club/upgraded-vehicles for this moment I'm upgrading the spreadsheet and the web-site, but I'm planning to close the first one soon
if you think that spreadsheet is more useful than web-site for some reasons - please tell me
Not to say that it’s more useful than the website, but I think I prefer the spreadsheet personally. Not hating on the website at all, @eSeal did an amazing job. I think I like the cleanliness of the spreadsheet, the ability to change the amount of cars you can view at once (by zooming in and out - at least on mobile in Google Sheets). I also just went and visited the site, and he’s requesting donations to keep hosting it. He says it will go offline in a month if he can’t get the money needed. Completely understand, valid logic, he put a lot of time in, etc. To that point, the spreadsheet is free to host and won’t be limited by costs. Just throwing all that out there.
Again, props to both of you for all the hard work you’ve done updating and maintaining both resources. Maybe I’m just embracing the old saying, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. At the very least, I’d like to see both resources continue instead of just switching to the site.
Comments
But I think this is added wrongly, it has both same upgrades
@eSeal will be fixing them soon!
there was a lot of such mistakes - cars with the same names were added like one car with lowest RQ.. I have fixed it on Friday, but you find one more
thanks
Again, props to both of you for all the hard work you’ve done updating and maintaining both resources. Maybe I’m just embracing the old saying, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. At the very least, I’d like to see both resources continue instead of just switching to the site.
Havent seen anyone with this, wonder if it’ll be competitive
3.3/2.3/3.3
RQ: 27
Top Speed: 211
0-60: 3.0
Grip: 99
RWD/Performance/Low
Weight: 1342
TC: Yes
ABS: Yes
3.3/2.3/3.3
Top Speed: 200
0-60: 2.5
Grip: 100
4WD/Performance/Low
Weight: 1608
TC: Yes
ABS: Yes
3.3/3.3/2.3
Top Speed: 213
0-60: 2.6
Grip: 95
RWD/Performance/Low
Weight: 1182
TC: Yes
ABS: Yes
there were few more cars with wrong pics. we were replacing old pictures with new ones with English text
3/0/3
RQ: 24
2.3/3.3/3.3
Top Speed: 143
0-60: 3.2
Grip: 94
RWD/Performance/Low
Weight: 504
TC: No
ABS: No
weight 1287
Excel-Sheet find here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16aZGL0QK_ynEangVldFggqWcrNdHpjnc/view?usp=drivesdk
Btw the EVO IX 360 didn't have TCS!
303; 1552kg; Low; TCS + ; ABS +