So I'm going to have to find another good car to use as a city streets car now that the RS7 is getting axed to low more than likely? yet the RS6 will be the same...
Really? This is driving me up a wall with this. I can't use my Mustang competitively anymore so it's one step forward five months back huh?
So I'm going to have to find another good car to use as a city streets car now that the RS7 is getting axed to low more than likely? yet the RS6 will be the same...
Really? This is driving me up a wall with this. I can't use my Mustang competitively anymore so it's one step forward five months back huh?
I thought the RS6 getting changed not the RS7
A30 2015 Audi RS 7 Sportback: Ground clearance is 109mm, should be low (link)
RS6 should be low but due to "Air Ride" (Remake when Nintendo) it may not get changed.
So I'm going to have to find another good car to use as a city streets car now that the RS7 is getting axed to low more than likely? yet the RS6 will be the same...
Really? This is driving me up a wall with this. I can't use my Mustang competitively anymore so it's one step forward five months back huh?
I thought the RS6 getting changed not the RS7
A30 2015 Audi RS 7 Sportback: Ground clearance is 109mm, should be low (link)
RS6 should be low but due to "Air Ride" (Remake when Nintendo) it may not get changed.
So I'm going to have to find another good car to use as a city streets car now that the RS7 is getting axed to low more than likely? yet the RS6 will be the same...
Really? This is driving me up a wall with this. I can't use my Mustang competitively anymore so it's one step forward five months back huh?
I thought the RS6 getting changed not the RS7
A30 2015 Audi RS 7 Sportback: Ground clearance is 109mm, should be low (link)
RS6 should be low but due to "Air Ride" (Remake when Nintendo) it may not get changed.
wut ?... source plz ?
Cause the all R8s have an on-board lifting system so does the new GT, and I bet some other high end cars
So I'm going to have to find another good car to use as a city streets car now that the RS7 is getting axed to low more than likely? yet the RS6 will be the same...
Really? This is driving me up a wall with this. I can't use my Mustang competitively anymore so it's one step forward five months back huh?
I thought the RS6 getting changed not the RS7
A30 2015 Audi RS 7 Sportback: Ground clearance is 109mm, should be low (link)
RS6 should be low but due to "Air Ride" (Remake when Nintendo) it may not get changed.
In my opinion such air ride systems should not be considered. Particularly for Audi‘s adaptive air suspension it would need to be considered that lifting up is just possible up to 80 kmh (~50 mph).
So I'm going to have to find another good car to use as a city streets car now that the RS7 is getting axed to low more than likely? yet the RS6 will be the same...
Really? This is driving me up a wall with this. I can't use my Mustang competitively anymore so it's one step forward five months back huh?
Again, that list is only player suggested corrections, they haven't been checked by us yet.
In this specific case, elsewhere in this thread we had a counter-point that the RS 6 has variable ground clearance so it looks like medium could be justified, so I added that note in. Naturally one of the first things to check is if that's true for the other Audi's.
So I'm going to have to find another good car to use as a city streets car now that the RS7 is getting axed to low more than likely? yet the RS6 will be the same...
Really? This is driving me up a wall with this. I can't use my Mustang competitively anymore so it's one step forward five months back huh?
Again, that list is only player suggested corrections, they haven't been checked by us yet.
In this specific case, elsewhere in this thread we had a counter-point that the RS 6 has variable ground clearance so it looks like medium could be justified, so I added that note in. Naturally one of the first things to check is if that's true for the other Audi's.
So I'm going to have to find another good car to use as a city streets car now that the RS7 is getting axed to low more than likely? yet the RS6 will be the same...
Really? This is driving me up a wall with this. I can't use my Mustang competitively anymore so it's one step forward five months back huh?
I thought the RS6 getting changed not the RS7
A30 2015 Audi RS 7 Sportback: Ground clearance is 109mm, should be low (link)
RS6 should be low but due to "Air Ride" (Remake when Nintendo) it may not get changed.
In my opinion such air ride systems should not be considered. Particularly for Audi‘s adaptive air suspension it would need to be considered that lifting up is just possible up to 80 kmh (~50 mph).
205 mm is massive. That's more than most crossovers and some SUVs.
It had an adjustable suspension that topped out at 170 mm. I'm not sure how low it could go, but probably still above 137 mm. The car should be classified as medium height.
"All XT Turbo models came with four-wheel disc brakes (as opposed to
discs and drums on lesser DL and GL models) and push-button four-wheel
drive, and all swapped the base models’ coil springs and struts for a
self-leveling pneumatic suspension. This gave the driver the further
benefit of an adjustable ride height, which increased ground clearance
to an impressive 6.7 inches when needed."
So I'm going to have to find another good car to use as a city streets car now that the RS7 is getting axed to low more than likely? yet the RS6 will be the same...
Really? This is driving me up a wall with this. I can't use my Mustang competitively anymore so it's one step forward five months back huh?
Again, that list is only player suggested corrections, they haven't been checked by us yet.
In this specific case, elsewhere in this thread we had a counter-point that the RS 6 has variable ground clearance so it looks like medium could be justified, so I added that note in. Naturally one of the first things to check is if that's true for the other Audi's.
I'm fully aware and apologize for seemingly attacking you. It's just the love-hate relation I had with the game died when I got the RS7 and I got upset at the potential I would once again be down a fair margin.
205 mm is massive. That's more than most crossovers and some SUVs.
It had an adjustable suspension that topped out at 170 mm. I'm not sure how low it could go, but probably still above 137 mm. The car should be classified as medium height.
"All XT Turbo models came with four-wheel disc brakes (as opposed to
discs and drums on lesser DL and GL models) and push-button four-wheel
drive, and all swapped the base models’ coil springs and struts for a
self-leveling pneumatic suspension. This gave the driver the further
benefit of an adjustable ride height, which increased ground clearance
to an impressive 6.7 inches when needed."
D11 2000 Chevrolet Blazer: The Blazer should have all
surface tires. It’s a true body on frame SUV with a two speed transfer case.
(currently has Standard tires)
·
9.1 is slower than what was recorded in 1979
with basically the same car. Here is the 924 doing 0-60 in 8.8 seconds. BTW –
this is a fantastic old-school comparison.
·
9.1 is slower than what was recorded in 1979
with basically the same car. Here is the 924 doing 0-60 in 8.8 seconds. BTW –
this is a fantastic old-school comparison.
Comments
RS6 should be low but due to "Air Ride" (Remake when Nintendo) it may not get changed.
so does the new GT, and I bet some other high end cars
How is this low ride height?
See, e.g., here:https://www.audi-technology-portal.de/en/chassis/suspension-control-systems/adaptive-air-suspension_en
In this specific case, elsewhere in this thread we had a counter-point that the RS 6 has variable ground clearance so it looks like medium could be justified, so I added that note in. Naturally one of the first things to check is if that's true for the other Audi's.
Ground clearance is indeed 127mm, why didn't you guys check before giving it low ground clearance??
https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/ford-gt-2004.html
C15 1979 Porsche 924 Turbo: 0-60 7,3>6,9 s
· 7.3 seems pretty fair. EVO has it at go 0-60 in 7.7 seconds https://www.evo.co.uk/porsche/924
· Here it is list as just over 7 seconds to hit 60 mph. https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/archive/article/march-1980/82/porsche-924-turbo
D14 1980 Audi Quattro: 0-60 6,6>6,8
· Dropping it even further to 6.9 or 7.0 seconds may make sense as those are the times I found.
· Here it is at 6.9 https://www.topspeed.com/cars/audi/1981-1991-audi-quattro-ar31371.html
· Here it is at 7.0 https://www.evo.co.uk/audi/quattro
D12 2002 BMW Turbo: 7,3>6,6
· The 0-60 time of 7.3 might be too low. It definitely is not 6.6.
· Here it is tested at 8.0 https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a32618/first-drive-bmw-2002-turbo/
· Here is another source putting it at 8.0 seconds. https://classics.honestjohn.co.uk/reviews/bmw/2002-turbo/specs/
D11 1989 BMW Z1: 0-60 7,8>9,0
· The 0-60 is not as slow as 9.0. 7.8 might be a bit fast though. The two tests performed have it in the 8.0 range
· Here it is at 8.1 https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-reviews/comparison/2016/losing-our-heads-bmw-z1-vs-lotus-elan-vs-mazda-mx-5-vs-tvr-s-car-1990/
· Here it is at 7.9 https://www.topgear.com/car-reviews/bmw/25-2dr-lhd/first-drive
· Here it is estimated at 9.0 https://www.topspeed.com/cars/bmw/1989-1991-bmw-z1-ar107255.html
D11 2000 Chevrolet Blazer: The Blazer should have all surface tires. It’s a true body on frame SUV with a two speed transfer case. (currently has Standard tires)
· This is as close as I can get to show the stock tires (down in the specs). The Blazer did come with SUV tires designed for on-road and off-road. https://www.motortrend.com/cars/chevrolet/blazer/2001/
- https://www.mercedes-amg.com/en/gt-customer-racing/gt-3.html
- Ground clearence is 119 mm, which falls under low category.
- I added an extra link so you can figure the midrange.
- This specs are for the Coupe, while the picture ingame is convertible, so please change that aswell.
- https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/mercedes-benz-clk-dtm-amg-c209-2004.html#aeng_mercedes-benz-clk-dtm-amg-2004-54-v8-kompressor
- http://www.zeperfs.com/en/fiche1886-mercedes-clk-dtm-amg.htm
- https://jalopnik.com/5926401/2012-mercedes-benz-c63-amg-the-jalopnik-review
- In-game is showing a W212, while the correct one is facelifted W211.
- http://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/2006/1542080/mercedes-benz_e_63_amg.html
- 0-60 is 6.8 sec
- Operating weight is 1749 kg.
- http://www.zeperfs.com/en/fiche236-mercedes-e-430.htm
E10 1976 Porsche 924: 0-60 9,1>11,6 s
· 9.1 is slower than what was recorded in 1979 with basically the same car. Here is the 924 doing 0-60 in 8.8 seconds. BTW – this is a fantastic old-school comparison.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/alfa-romeo-spider-vs-chevy-corvette-datsun-280-zx-fiat-spider-2000-mazda-rx-7-porsche-924-comparison-test
E7 1969 Porsche 914: 0-60 12,3>13,7 s
· 0 to 60 timing for this are all over the map
· It’s quoted at 13.0 seconds here https://www.motoringresearch.com/car-reviews/retro-road-test/retro-road-test-porsche-914/
· Here two American magazines achieved a 14.0 and a 11.8 https://auto.howstuffworks.com/porsche-914-history3.htm
E7 1971 Mazda RX-3: Ground clearance looks like it should be medium
· Ground clearance 165 mm. Should be medium http://www.automobile-catalog.com/auta_details1.php
F3 1980 Cadillac Seville: Cadillac seville 0-60 13,2>10,5
· This number is accurate although I cannot find anything right now to back it up.