And man I'm not here to argue with you.I also apologize if you or any US player felt offended by my posts but I want game to be accurate how it should be.GTR is great of the line with **** MRA...Corvette have great MRA and It's like should be but grip for 29 RQ car is one of the lowest IG and it isn't right
@Huskic69 If that's the case, then tons of others big-engined, high-powered heavy cars' MRA should be revised too, e.g. the XLR-V
does it seem kinda off that a car that has the same as a freaking zonda has midrange of a honda?
Not really, considering lots of Hondas in game actually have decent MRA. Not godly, but decent. It's a Japanese car, you don't expect godly MRA from it, except the Furai, of course. (Hutch gave the Furai negative MRA for some reason.)
A better comparison should be "The freaking Zonda 760RS having the MRA of a Camaro Convertible"
@Huskic69 If that's the case, then tons of others big-engined, high-powered heavy cars' MRA should be revised too, e.g. the XLR-V
does it seem kinda off that a car that has the same as a freaking zonda has midrange of a honda?
Not really, considering lots of Hondas in game actually have decent MRA. Not godly, but decent. It's a Japanese car, you don't expect godly MRA from it, except the Furai, of course. (Hutch gave the Furai negative MRA for some reason.)
A better comparison should be "The freaking Zonda 760RS having the MRA of a Camaro Convertible"
@Huskic69 Considering that I'm not a car nerd that reads car books every single day... And that I don't have a car nor a driver's license... Yes I don't know much about cars, if you would like to think it that way.
And this thread is for car corrections, can we stop discussing about this off topic thingy and start posting something that is about the corrections?
Horsepower to 103hp (was 105, Hutch used PS instead of HP); Weight to 1060kg (was 1024). Reference link is also above.
E10 Mazda RX-7 (1985) - We can go two ways with this. The image and MY for the car is pointing at the 1985 Japanese-Spec Savanna RX-7 GT. But the power figures however, points at the 1987 European-Spec RX-7.
Suggested Corrections:
1) Go Japan. Horsepower to 182hp (was 148); Torque to 181ft-lb (was 135); Weight to 1210kg. (was 1223); Correct Name to "Mazda Savanna RX-7 GT". There are no Manufacturer claims for this model so I can't help with the stats. Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1985/1638770/mazda_savanna_rx-7_gt.html
2) Go Europe. Model Year to 1987 (was 1985); Correct image to the corresponding European-Spec RX-7 of the same year; Top Speed to 131mph (was 130); 0-60 time to 7.6s (was 8.6); Weight to 1205kg. (was 1223). Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1987/54140/mazda_rx-7.html
Both Japanese-Spec and European-Spec have the Ground Clearance of 150mm. Therefore it would be medium.
D11 Mazda Eunos Roadster RS-Limited (1994) - Name change to "Eunos Roadster RS-Limited" (from "Mazda Eunos Roadster RS-Limited")
The Autozam AZ-1 is called Autozam AZ-1 in game and not Mazda Autozam AZ-1. If you can do it for the Autozam you can do the same for Eunos too. Just saying.
Horsepower to 128hp (was 132); Torque to 116ft-lb (was 114); Weight to 990kg. (was 983).
D12 Mazda 3 (2018) - This particular model in the picture is the Limited Edition Sport Black model. Suggested rename to "Mazda 3 Sport Black"
Weight to 1205kg (was 1351).
D13 Mazda RX-7 Convertible (1988) - Model Year to 1989 (was 1988).
Name change to "Mazda RX-7 Turbo II Cabriolet" (was Mazda RX-7 Convertible)
Top Speed to 143mph (was 145); 0-60 time to 6.6s (was 7.9); Horsepower to 197hp (was 200, Hutch used PS instead of HP); Weight to 1380kg (was 1320); Ground clearance is 145mm, should be medium.
D13 Mazda MX-5 BBR Turbo (1990) - Model Year to 1991 (was 1990); 0-60 time to 6.8s (was 7.2, Hutch apparently used the 0-100km/h stat)
This Mazda RX-8 is the "High Power" version with 237hp instead of the regular 189hp version, as evidenced by the 6-speed gear lever in this image: https://www.evo.co.uk/features/19659/mazda-rx-8-in-pictures#9 (High Power have 6-speed manual while the regular have 5-speed manual as stated by Evo)
So the specs for the 2006 RX-8 Revolution High Power were used as there is no official claims for the PZ. So the stats wouldn't be fully accurate, but at least it's more accurate than what we have now.
C15 Mazda RX-7 Turbo (1985) - Change name to "Mazda RX-7 Turbo II" (was "Mazda RX-7 Turbo"); Model year to 1989 (was 1985). Reference: https://i.imgur.com/vzkfP7Z.png (The car in the image proved to be the later "Turbo II" model with the side badging)
B19 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (1992) - Year change to 1999. (Type RS's were made between 1999 to 2002, so it's up to you to select any year between 1999 to 2002. Reference: https://i.imgur.com/TaWp4PBr.png)
B19 Mazda RX-7 Type RZ (1992) - Year change to 2000. (Type RZ's were the limited edition, only produced in the year 2000. Reference: https://i.imgur.com/1phi7Ior.png)
B19 Mazda RX-7 Spirit R (1992) - Year change to 2002. (Spirit R's were the final edition model for the RX-7, only produced in the year 2002. Reference: https://i.imgur.com/Fo45a20r.png)
And this car have issues. The image is from Spirit R Type C, while the specs are (apparently) from the Type A.
I don't have the official manufacturer claims for this car aswell, but Automobile Catalog reckons it can do 0-60 in 4.8 seconds. Coincidentally, Top Speed website also have the Spirit R's 0-60 with 4.8 seconds. Reference: https://www.topspeed.com/cars/mazda-rx7/ke344.html
The CX-5 does not require any changes. They are using the North American model. The 2018 CX-5 GX comes with the gasoline engine and front wheel drive. As well, the 2017.5 and the 2018 are virtually the same so the image is fine. Here is a link - https://www.mazda.ca/en/vehicles/cx-5/overview/
As a side note - Automobile-Catalog is a great reference for dimension specifications, but shouldn't be used for performance data. The site creates estimations of performance based on a formula. From the site:
"The simulation of all cars
accelerations and performance in road conditions is based on
ProfessCars™ software and detailed technical parameters of each
individual mode"
Which is also because I didn't provide Top Speed and / or 0-60 corrections for some old Mazdas because there just isn't any factory claims datas for it.
Mauvaise photo des Renault safrane biturbo, twingo de 1993, la twingo GT de 2016, clio de 1990, scenic de 2016, clio de 2016, megane de 2002 et la BMW 330d de 1998 La BMW représentée est un 330i (E90) de 2001 et non une 330d (E46) de 1998. La safrane représentée est une 3.0 V6 PRV et non une biturbo, la twingo représentée est un modèle de 1998/2000, la twingo GT représentée est un modèle GT de 2007 et non pas 2016, la clio représentée est un modèle baccara (version luxe) de 1994 phase 2 et non la phase 1 de 1990, le scenic représenté est un modèle de 2013 et non de 2016 la face avant est totalement différente entre ces deux modèles, la clio IV de 2016 représentée est un modèle de 2012 car le modèle de 2016 a les feux diurnes dans les optiques et non dans la calandre et la megane II de 2002 est la phase 2 qui est apparu en 2006 elle a la calandre noire dirigée vers le bas alors que les modèles phase 1 ont la calandre droite voici des photos
Not sure of tyre change. But certainly it should be one of the fastest 1/4 mile cars ig Imo. So the fastest (irl) is copo camaro followed by chiron then idk if super sport or demon or 918 or 720s. Maybe p1 as well. Dunno where the pp will stand.
Comments
can you revise the mid range acceleration of the Mercedes SL73 AMG, it just doesnt seem alright
If that's the case, then tons of others big-engined, high-powered heavy cars' MRA should be revised too, e.g. the XLR-V
A better comparison should be "The freaking Zonda 760RS having the MRA of a Camaro Convertible"
And this thread is for car corrections, can we stop discussing about this off topic thingy and start posting something that is about the corrections?
Rafa3l722 found it but he told me he didn't want to post it so I was like "wat"
So here it is anyways
I did this thing for like a few hours straight, mostly, and was getting tired on the end so there might be some goofs :P
Note: The stats on the Mazdas are harder to find since most of them were initially sold in Japan so there's no Factory Claims for those.
Chapter 1: UnCommons (F + E class)
F5 Mazda Carol (1962) - The Power Figures of it doesn't match with the 1st gen Carol. Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1962/1577720/mazda_carol_600.html
But it does match with the first phase of the 2nd gen Carol, sold between 1989 and 1990 under the Autozam marque. Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1989/1639715/autozam_carol_e.html
And the body style for the 1st gen Carol was sedan only, but it was listed as "Hatchback" in game, which is only available on 2nd gen onwards.
And the drive type for the 1st gen Carol was RWD, with FWD layout being found in the 2nd gen Carol.
Suggested corrections: Change model year to 1989 or 1990 and change the image to the corresponding year.
E7 Mazda RX-3 Coupe (1971) - Ground Clearance is 165mm. Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1971/1583720/mazda_savanna_gs_coupe.html
E8 Mazda CX-5 (2018) - Model year is 2017. Reference: https://i.imgur.com/N6D5Pjn.png
Fuel type for the said car is Diesel aswell, and not Petrol. The reference link is also above.
Suggested corrections:
1) Change the image to the correct trim level, which is the 2.0l Skyactive-G.
2) Change the Model year to 2017, correct Horsepower to 148 (was 163), Torque to 280 (was 155), and weight to 1595kg (was 1574). And the stats to 127mph & 8.9s 0-60 (was 125mph & 9.9s) Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/2017/2533160/mazda_cx-5_2_2_skyactiv-d_150_fwd.html
E8 Mazda 2 (2018) - Model year is 2017. Reference: https://i.imgur.com/mqynnSf.png
Correct Horsepower to 74hp (was 72), and Weight to 970kg. (was 1035). Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/2017/2085725/mazda_2_1_5_skyactiv-g_75.html
Correct Top Speed to 106mph (was 117), amd 0-60 time to 11.4s (was 10.8). Reference link is also above.
E8 Autozam AZ-1 (1992) - Top Speed is Electronically limited to 87mph. (was 91mph) Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1992/1641695/autozam_az-1.html
Ground Clearance is 135mm. Reference link is also above.
E9 Mazda Cosmo (1967) - Top Speed to 115mph (was 120); 0-60 time to 8.2s (was 9.3). Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1967/1579115/mazda_cosmo_sport_110_s_l10a.html (Under Factory Claims section)
The full (and proper name) for the car is "Mazda Cosmo Sport 110 S". Reference link is also above.
Weight to 940kg. (was 930). Reference link is also above.
E9 Mazda Cosmo (1975) - Top Speed to 115mph. (was 123) Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1975/1617710/mazda_cosmo_ap_custom_5-speed.html
Weight to 1145kg. (was 980). Reference link is also above.
Ground Clearance is 155mm. Reference link is also above.
E10 Mazda RX-7 (1978) - Top Speed to 118mph (was 115mph); 0-60 time to 9.0s (was 9.5s, Hutch used the 0-100km/h time instead). Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1978/37265/mazda_rx-7.html
Horsepower to 103hp (was 105, Hutch used PS instead of HP); Weight to 1060kg (was 1024). Reference link is also above.
E10 Mazda RX-7 (1985) - We can go two ways with this. The image and MY for the car is pointing at the 1985 Japanese-Spec Savanna RX-7 GT. But the power figures however, points at the 1987 European-Spec RX-7.
Suggested Corrections:
1) Go Japan. Horsepower to 182hp (was 148); Torque to 181ft-lb (was 135); Weight to 1210kg. (was 1223); Correct Name to "Mazda Savanna RX-7 GT". There are no Manufacturer claims for this model so I can't help with the stats. Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1985/1638770/mazda_savanna_rx-7_gt.html
2) Go Europe. Model Year to 1987 (was 1985); Correct image to the corresponding European-Spec RX-7 of the same year; Top Speed to 131mph (was 130); 0-60 time to 7.6s (was 8.6); Weight to 1205kg. (was 1223). Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1987/54140/mazda_rx-7.html
Both Japanese-Spec and European-Spec have the Ground Clearance of 150mm. Therefore it would be medium.
E10 Mazda 6 (2018) - Weight to 1360kg. (was 1465). Reference: https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/2017/2159915/mazda_6_2_0_skyactiv-g_145.html
Chapter 1 END
The car has 16.3 seconds 1/4 mile time.
And compare it in game: 17.26 seconds.
In my opinion most Mazdas in game have underrated MRA, Rotary or not.
La BMW représentée est un 330i (E90) de 2001 et non une 330d (E46) de 1998.
La safrane représentée est une 3.0 V6 PRV et non une biturbo, la twingo représentée est un modèle de 1998/2000, la twingo GT représentée est un modèle GT de 2007 et non pas 2016, la clio représentée est un modèle baccara (version luxe) de 1994 phase 2 et non la phase 1 de 1990, le scenic représenté est un modèle de 2013 et non de 2016 la face avant est totalement différente entre ces deux modèles, la clio IV de 2016 représentée est un modèle de 2012 car le modèle de 2016 a les feux diurnes dans les optiques et non dans la calandre et la megane II de 2002 est la phase 2 qui est apparu en 2006 elle a la calandre noire dirigée vers le bas alors que les modèles phase 1 ont la calandre droite
voici des photos
Stock 720S 0-60 2.39s
*Edit:
(from the video)