Skip to content

Unbelievable results

1…4142444647

Comments

  • mario_mmario_m Posts: 175 ✭✭✭

    · Share on Facebook
  • KcrayKcray Posts: 164 ✭✭✭
    Not unbelievable, yet unexpected 
    · Share on Facebook
  • ErilixErilix Posts: 46 ✭✭✭
    Kcray said:
    Not unbelievable, yet unexpected 

    That Evora has such an insane MRA tho :#
    · Share on Facebook
  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 998 ✭✭✭
    Yep, MRA, i don't think you are getting under 60 for a long time inside the north loop.

    But the MRA has been notified in the cars correction part of the forum
    · Share on Facebook
  • bobdylanbobdylan Posts: 3,546 ✭✭✭✭✭
    wrong tyres sure .... but top speed run , some difference in max there 
    · Share on Facebook
  • NicooooooNicoooooo Posts: 46 ✭✭
    edited November 2020

    Mine was 233, his 323 but still
    · Share on Facebook
  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 998 ✭✭✭
    323 vs 323, the white loose :)
    · Share on Facebook
  • bobdylanbobdylan Posts: 3,546 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Better mid range ...
    320 torque vs 180 ... yup makes perfect sense. 

    Why don't we make one of the smart cars faster than a bugatti hutch just for a laugh as its just a game with magic numbers 
    · Share on Facebook
  • TD42792TD42792 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭✭✭
    bobdylan said:

    Better mid range ...
    320 torque vs 180 ... yup makes perfect sense. 

    Why don't we make one of the smart cars faster than a bugatti hutch just for a laugh as its just a game with magic numbers 
    I would think it has to do with tc/abs, makes a big difference in the rain
    · Share on Facebook
  • TopDrives34865TopDrives34865 Posts: 56 ✭✭
    @Hutch_Dmitri pleaaase explaiiin ??? That's a damn FAST circuit...
    · Share on Facebook
  • HeissRodHeissRod Posts: 7,670 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's not uncommon for a 699 to win fast circuit, as you start getting into the higher RQ cars.  Better power-to-weight ratio.
    · Share on Facebook
  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 998 ✭✭✭
    edited November 2020



    Ok. So same car, mine with an upgrade the other one without,

    I lost the course due to that. And how on earth do the other car have a better mid-range, when we have the same engine, and my car/suv is lighter !
    · Share on Facebook
  • bobdylanbobdylan Posts: 3,546 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TD42792 said:
    bobdylan said:

    Better mid range ...
    320 torque vs 180 ... yup makes perfect sense. 

    Why don't we make one of the smart cars faster than a bugatti hutch just for a laugh as its just a game with magic numbers 
    I would think it has to do with tc/abs, makes a big difference in the rain
    Yup ... both have both 
    · Share on Facebook
  • TD42792TD42792 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭✭✭
    bobdylan said:
    TD42792 said:
    bobdylan said:

    Better mid range ...
    320 torque vs 180 ... yup makes perfect sense. 

    Why don't we make one of the smart cars faster than a bugatti hutch just for a laugh as its just a game with magic numbers 
    I would think it has to do with tc/abs, makes a big difference in the rain
    Yup ... both have both 
    Ich dont think so, rs levante has no abs?!?!
    · Share on Facebook
  • ambworthambworth Posts: 2 ✭
    Yes, the Peugeot is a little heavier, but is that enough to lose to the other stats/HP/Torque? Was it the traction control?
    · Share on Facebook
  • REALAISREALAIS Posts: 917 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2020
    AslanV said:



    Ok. So same car, mine with an upgrade the other one without,

    I lost the course due to that. And how on earth do the other car have a better mid-range, when we have the same engine, and my car/suv is lighter !
    You are long term player! You should know that in offroad less weight is less traction. And in game where is engine traction bonus. Why would you go after 363 and not 633 for offroad car?
    · Share on Facebook
  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 998 ✭✭✭
    I should know in game, but in physics? Come-on !

    There is no tank to win the Dakar or Baja !

    For the ETB part, it was needed for dry city ;)
    · Share on Facebook
  • REALAISREALAIS Posts: 917 ✭✭✭✭
    AslanV said:
    I should know in game, but in physics? Come-on !

    There is no tank to win the Dakar or Baja !

    For the ETB part, it was needed for dry city ;)
    Okay, but for that you are "paying" in offroad.
    And why you push come on to me? It is in the game, it is not my fault. Why are you trying to shoot messenger?
    · Share on Facebook
  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 998 ✭✭✭
    Sorry I you feel attacked by my message, it was not the intent ;)

    Yep, paying the price, I hope for not too long (physics improvement)
    · Share on Facebook
  • REALAISREALAIS Posts: 917 ✭✭✭✭
    AslanV said:
    Sorry I you feel attacked by my message, it was not the intent ;)

    Yep, paying the price, I hope for not too long (physics improvement)
    Yeah, Etb gone for good would be nice. As nice bonus it is when you have it with weaker hand, but it doesnt make game experience good in overall.
    · Share on Facebook
  • SquadalaSquadala Posts: 205 ✭✭✭
    edited November 2020
    Just some interesting results. Jaguar is a joke.1.6 Corsa beats Extige with off road tires, Sure.R/T is by stats better in every way. Except MRA ofcourse.Nothing special here. This was just other way around before.







    · Share on Facebook
  • chemineecheminee Posts: 162 ✭✭✭
    Squadala said:
    Just some interesting results. Jaguar is a joke.
    Escort weighs 50% of that Jaguar.
    But I agree, that Jag is a joke.
    · Share on Facebook
  • 0171801718 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭
    edited December 2020
    *removed
    Post edited by 01718 on
    · Share on Facebook
  • rkorallerkoralle Posts: 770 ✭✭✭
    That ruf was a fine car those days. Mine sitting at 993 sux now!

    · Share on Facebook
  • rkorallerkoralle Posts: 770 ✭✭✭
    Fast track!?
    · Share on Facebook
  • 0171801718 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭
    REALAIS said:

    You are long term player! You should know that in offroad less weight is less traction. And in game where is engine traction bonus. Why would you go after 363 and not 633 for offroad car?


    Would one of the long term players care to explain why the 699 Volvo wins here? I mean, ETB and weight-traction-thingy?!

    Ah ok so this time it is Slalom and weight matters again ;-).
    · Share on Facebook
  • crookedlumbercrookedlumber Posts: 3 ✭
    caught me by surprise. 
    · Share on Facebook
  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 998 ✭✭✭
    It seems to have an improvement, if you look at the top speed. 121 vs 211 ?

    I guess because the 323 is winning against the 233 ?
    · Share on Facebook
  • HeissRodHeissRod Posts: 7,670 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This is 633 wining versus 363.  Historically, 969 usually wins versus 699 on car park, so this kinda makes sense.
    · Share on Facebook
Sign In or Register to comment.