Pulled this thing....I was happy...but but but it’s an rq 23. I can run some times if u guys want. Doubt it will amount to anything especial the picture is nice tho...
Pulled this thing....I was happy...but but but it’s an rq 23. I can run some times if u guys want. Doubt it will amount to anything especial the picture is nice tho...
Old car, new picture, a bit of a heap too I'm afraid, I had one unused for the longest time, I ran it of desperation in the recent Chevy event and will fuse it without blinking at some point.
I’ve pointed out in the relevant pre update threads for months that this IG picture is incorrect, can it eventually be changed? At some point? Please?
I think the confusion arises because in the UK the WRX didn't exist, we had the turbo 2000, I'd need to check but the stats look right for that car, and the image is certainly correct.
I’ve pointed out in the relevant pre update threads for months that this IG picture is incorrect, can it eventually be changed? At some point? Please?
I think the confusion arises because in the UK the WRX didn't exist, we had the turbo 2000, I'd need to check but the stats look right for that car, and the image is certainly correct.
What image is correct Martin? The IG pic is a mica red (not available in 93) GC8 UK ‘99 turbo 2000.
I’ve pointed out in the relevant pre update threads for months that this IG picture is incorrect, can it eventually be changed? At some point? Please?
I think the confusion arises because in the UK the WRX didn't exist, we had the turbo 2000, I'd need to check but the stats look right for that car, and the image is certainly correct.
What image is correct Martin? The IG pic is a mica red (not available in 93) GC8 UK ‘99 turbo 2000.
Fair point, the registration doesn't match the car year, I just meant that the picture is of a turbo 2000
I’ve pointed out in the relevant pre update threads for months that this IG picture is incorrect, can it eventually be changed? At some point? Please?
I think the confusion arises because in the UK the WRX didn't exist, we had the turbo 2000, I'd need to check but the stats look right for that car, and the image is certainly correct.
What image is correct Martin? The IG pic is a mica red (not available in 93) GC8 UK ‘99 turbo 2000.
Fair point, the registration doesn't match the car year, I just meant that the picture is of a turbo 2000
The stats and title are correct for the more powerful Japanese WRX as close as I can make it out, just wrong picture.
Pulled this thing....I was happy...but but but it’s an rq 23. I can run some times if u guys want. Doubt it will amount to anything especial the picture is nice tho...
Old car, new picture, a bit of a heap too I'm afraid, I had one unused for the longest time, I ran it of desperation in the recent Chevy event and will fuse it without blinking at some point.
You are so right....silly me. It is an old car lol...I accomplished nothing, gathered food 😆
Pulled this thing....I was happy...but but but it’s an rq 23. I can run some times if u guys want. Doubt it will amount to anything especial the picture is nice tho...
Pulled this thing....I was happy...but but but it’s an rq 23. I can run some times if u guys want. Doubt it will amount to anything especial the picture is nice tho...
What used to be the old picture?
The new picture reminds me a lot of NFS Hot Pursuit 2
Got the same car yesterday, going to fuse it up to 3.0/3.0/3.0 just for the hell of it... It's completely useless as it is though. Worse than even the QX50.
Do not sell. There's an error with this one, apparently it should be AWD at least and I'm sure someone suggested a chunk more powerful.
Seriousy?They don't make mistakes.Or they never said they made one...It's really sad.Why can't Hutch tell to their loyal players...Yeee we againg **** it up...again and say sorry?All this cars corrections and wrong stats shoudn't ever appear in car game like this.Sorry to say it but your car knowledge are very small.Then we players pointing out your stupid mistakes with hope you correct them.If correct any it takes months to get it rigth.Then new car update is comming with another wrong stats...Seriousy?
Unfortunately, all of the D class USA "Drag" cars I have pulled thus far have been underwhelming. Stock vs stock, they have all been significantly slower than the RQ12, '70 Monte Carlo (and 396 'Vette, ofcourse). Haven't found any MRA gems yet.. Thanks to @Nacho101 for listing those times btw.
Also, and maybe I am missing something here, but why is this '03 Monte Carlo SS listed as RWD? They added the '91 Lumina Z34 as RWD too. Neither of those gens released any RWD models, IIRC.I've driven that particular Jeff Gordon "moar stickers" edition. It came optioned with an N/A 3800 (series 1), attached to that terrible slushbox automatic driving the front wheels.
A little off topic, but I dig this new pic of the '03 Jag XJR. I don't remember the old pic, but I want to keep it now just because it looks so slick!
Do not sell. There's an error with this one, apparently it should be AWD at least and I'm sure someone suggested a chunk more powerful.
Seriousy?They don't make mistakes.Or they never said they made one...It's really sad.Why can't Hutch tell to their loyal players...Yeee we againg **** it up...again and say sorry?All this cars corrections and wrong stats shoudn't ever appear in car game like this.Sorry to say it but your car knowledge are very small.Then we players pointing out your stupid mistakes with hope you correct them.If correct any it takes months to get it rigth.Then new car update is comming with another wrong stats...Seriousy?
I guess hutch will finally change its name instead of stats
Got the same car yesterday, going to fuse it up to 3.0/3.0/3.0 just for the hell of it... It's completely useless as it is though. Worse than even the QX50.
Comments
the picture is nice tho...
Dunno, the Corvette is way for stylish!
Thoughts? Has higher 0-60 but better handling than the RQ18 CTS. Could be decent on tracks without long straights.
Also, and maybe I am missing something here, but why is this '03 Monte Carlo SS listed as RWD? They added the '91 Lumina Z34 as RWD too. Neither of those gens released any RWD models, IIRC.
A little off topic, but I dig this new pic of the '03 Jag XJR. I don't remember the old pic, but I want to keep it now just because it looks so slick!